Sport-Orthopädie - Sport-Traumatologie - Sports Orthopaedics and Traumatology
ORIGINALARBEIT/ORIGINAL PAPERReproducibility of maximum isokinetic trunk strength testing in healthy adolescent athletesReproduzierbarkeit isokinetischer maximaler Rumpfkraftmessungen bei beschwerdefreien Nachwuchsathleten
Introduction
In children and adolescents athletes isokinetic testing is often applied to describe and evaluate individual and population specific characteristics like age- or gender related changes in strength over growth and maturation [1], [11], [12]. Moreover, it is used to define deficits in defined pathologies, to prevent injuries as well as to evaluate effectiveness of training and therapy [25]. Previous investigations mainly focused their analysis on force capacity of the adolescent knee and/or elbow joint complex [7], [8], [16], [17], [21]. Only few studies examined trunk strength capacity [1], [24]. However, trunk strength capacity is considered beneficial to compensate external forces and loads [3], [18]. Among others trunk strength therefore is essential for stability and performance of the core [2], [3], [12], [15]. Most frequently data for trunk flexion/extension measurements are reported, both for adults and adolescents [2], [9], [13], [22], [24], [25]. Research on lateral flexion and rotation are quite rare and reproducibility in these two planes (lateral flexion/rotation) is insufficiently analyzed [25].
The few available studies on trunk strength performance in children and adolescents [1], [24] do not report reliability of isokinetic measurements used. Nevertheless, a reliable assessment of isokinetic data is important for evaluation, conclusion and valid implications of measured strength data [6], [11]. In a recent review on pediatric strength testing De Ste Croix [11] stated that test-retest-variability in isokinetic strength testing in children ranges between 5 and 10%. Furthermore, De Ste Croix [11] deduces in his review that extension movements are more reliable than flexion movements, concentric muscle action is more reliable than eccentric work and that reliability is reduced with increased testing velocity, regardless of joint tested.
Iga et al. [16] and Deighan et al. [8] reported excellent reliability of isokinetic strength testing in the knee (r = 0.95) and elbow (r = 0.97) joint in children aged 6 to 10 years. Kellis et al. [17] showed clinically acceptable to excellent reliability (ICCs 0.89 to 0.98) for both concentric and eccentric knee flexion/extension in thirteen-year-old soccer players. Carvalho et al. [7] investigated the reliability of isokinetic knee strength testing among 14 to 16-year-old basketball players [7]. They reported an ICC from 0.72 to 0.99 for concentric and eccentric testing modes, resulting from clinical not acceptable (ICC 0.72 for eccentric mode) to clinical acceptable (ICC 0.75-0.90) and excellent (ICC > 0.90) reproducibility. To the author's knowledge, however, no study is available that reports data on the reproducibility of isokinetic trunk strength testing in adolescence.
Current research on adults analyses the reproducibility of trunk strength testing in flexion/extension measurements. Baur et al. [2] calculated clinical acceptable to excellent reliability (range ICC 0.74 – 0.91) for different testing velocities (60°/s; 120°/s) in trunk flexion/extension of 20 healthy adults. Dervisevic et al. [10] also reported a clinical acceptable to excellent reproducibility (ICC between 0.78-0.91) of isokinetic trunk flexion/extension measurements in different velocities (30°/s; 60°/s) and contraction modes (concentric/eccentric) in adult athletes. Dvir & Keating [13] testified partially clinical acceptable reproducibility of an isokinetic test protocol (con/ecc; 10°/sec, 40°/sec) measuring trunk extension strength in healthy men and women with women (ICCs: 0.70-0.87) showing higher ICCs than men (ICCs: 0.52-0.78).
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of isokinetic trunk strength testing in different planes (rotation; flexion/extension) in healthy adolescent athletes.
Section snippets
Subjects
Fifteen active adolescent athletes out of various sports were recruited for the study. All athletes were members of the elite school of sports or a sport club with systematic and regular training. All teenagers and their legal guardian signed informed consent before voluntary participation in the study. The study was approved by University's Ethical Commission and confirms to the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki). Subjects suffering from pain or
Results
Pain score was below 1.0 cm on VAS at the beginning of measurements (M1:0.02±0.06cm; M2: 0.02±0.06cm) and did not change for all 13 included adolescents over the two testing protocols on both measurement days (M1/M2) (p>0.05).
Absolut and normalized peak torques (mean ± SD) for all testing conditions in rotation and flexion/extension are shown in Table 2. Ratios of all testing conditions for trunk rotation (A), trunk flexion/extension (C) as well as eccentric/concentric mode (B; D) are reported
Discussion
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of maximum isokinetic trunk strength testing in healthy adolescent athletes. The main finding of the study is an clinical acceptable (11 out of 16 conditions) to excellent (3 out of 16 conditions) reliability of the isokinetic testing protocols used showing critical results for only few measurement conditions (2 out of 16 conditions) [2], [10].
The ICC is the most used indicator for reproducibility and often compared between studies.
Conclusion
This pilot study provides first reliability values of trunk strength evaluation in young healthy athletes in two different planes (rotation; flexion/extension). The protocol described delivers first indications for a reliable tool to evaluate trunk strength capacity in adolescent athletes in different planes, velocities and contraction modes that needs further validation with larger cohorts.
Conflicts of interest
There is no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by a research grant from the National Institute of Sport Science of Germany (granted number: BISp IIA 1-080126/09-13).
References (28)
- et al.
Reproducibility and validity of a new test protocol for measuring isokinetic trunk extension strength
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon).
(2001) - et al.
Plantar pressure trigger for reliable nerve stimulus application during dynamic H-reflex measurements
Gait Posture.
(2013) - et al.
Altered muscle recruitment during extension from trunk flexion in low back pain developers
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon).
(2012) - et al.
Cross-sectional study of the isokinetic muscle trunk strength among school children
Spine
(1993) - et al.
Trunk extensor and flexor strength of long-distance race car drivers and physically active controls
Journal of Sports Sciences.
(2010) - et al.
The importance of sensory-motor control in providing core stability: implications for measurement and training
Sports Med.
(2008) - et al.
Intersite Reliability of Repeated Isokinetic Measurements: Cybex Back Systems Including Trunk Rotation. Trunk Extension-Flexion, and Lift task
Isokinet Exerc Sci.
(1993) - et al.
Effect of visual feedback and verbal encouragement on concentric quadriceps and hamstrings peak torque of males and females
Isokinet Exerc Sci.
(2000) - et al.
The reproducibility of isokinetic dynamometry data
Isokinet Exerc Sci.
(2012) - et al.
Assessment of reliability in isokinetic testing among adolescent basketball players
Medicina (Kaunas).
(2011)